Microsoft is bundling up some functionality from previously separated product codenames, e.g. Velocity and Dublin and bundling them as AppFabric . Download the Beta here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/ee695849.aspx Interested in training on some of that new functionality? Contact me!
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
11-17-2009
Filed under:
Filed under: WCF, BizTalk, .NET, BPM, WF, SOA, DUBLIN, PDC, PDC 2009, PDC09, PDC 09, PDC2009, Microsoft AppFabric, AppFabric
Some exciting things for “Dublin” and “Velocity” will be given to the world today at Microsoft PDC 2009. Too bad that I am still under NDA for this :)
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
11-17-2009
Filed under:
Filed under: BizTalk Server, .NET, BPM, Workflow, WF, Windows Workflow Foundation, DUBLIN, PDC08, ASP.NET, Visual Studio 2010, VS 2010, PDC 2009, PDC09, PDC 09, PDC2009
(German version may be written at a later time / Deutsche Version wird gegebenenfalls später geschrieben) This post combines several concepts from several posts about BizTalk Workflow Services . You should read the intro , about flow control , about send&receive activities and about the little...
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
10-02-2008
Filed under:
Filed under: Windows Communication Foundation, WCF, .NET 3.0, VS 2005, Visual Studio 2005, BizTalk, .NET, Visual Studio 2008, VS 2008, .NET 3.5, BPM, Workflow, WF, Windows Workflow Foundation, Cloud Computing, Cloud, BizTalk Services, Cloud Services, OSLO, BizTalk Workflow Services
(German version may be provided at a later stage / Deutsche Version wird gegebenenfalls nachgereicht) In previous posts, I gave an introduction to BizTalk Workflow Services , I wrote about flow control and rambled about tricks you can do in conditions . This post will deal with the send and receive activities...
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
10-02-2008
Filed under:
Filed under: Windows Communication Foundation, WCF, .NET 3.0, BizTalk, .NET, .NET 3.5, BPM, Workflow, WF, Windows Workflow Foundation, SOA, Cloud Computing, Cloud, BizTalk Services, Cloud Services, OSLO, BizTalk Workflow Services
(German version may come at a later time / Deutsche Version wird eventuell nachgereicht) First of all: Please play around with BizTalk Workflow Services and share what you find out. I feel lonely ;) This post deals with BizTalk Workflow Services . However, most of it also applies to general Workflow...
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
09-29-2008
Filed under:
Filed under: .NET 3.0, BizTalk, BizTalk Server, .NET 3.5, BPM, Workflow, WF, Windows Workflow Foundation, Cloud Computing, Cloud, BizTalk Services, Cloud Services
(German version maybe coming later / deutsche Version folgt eventuell später) This post is a continuation of my intro to BizTalk Workflow Services . When orchestrating anything or in more simple words, when implementing an algorithm, we typically need a type of flow control. What is the order of the...
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
08-09-2008
Filed under:
Filed under: .NET 3.0, BizTalk, BizTalk Server, .NET 3.5, BPM, Workflow, WF, Cloud Computing, Cloud, BizTalk Services, Cloud Services
(German version maybe coming later / deutsche Version folgt eventuell später) http://workflow.biztalk.net now offers a CTP of BizTalk Workflow Services. Let's look at what that means. First you should download the latest version of the SDK. Right now this is the file " BizTalk Services...
Posted to
Andreas Erben's posts
by
Andreas Erben
on
08-05-2008
Filed under:
Filed under: .NET 3.0, VS 2005, Visual Studio 2005, BizTalk, BizTalk Server, .NET, Visual Studio 2008, VS 2008, .NET 3.5, BPM, Workflow, WF, Windows Workflow Foundation, SOA, Cloud Computing, Cloud, BizTalk Services, Cloud Services
Sometimes you will have a situation where you want to compile (and execute) a workflow at runtime. This is relatively easy when your workflow is pure .XOML and derives from classes available through the TypeProvider that implement everything it needs. When you want to test an activity that implements...
Usually I agree with Damir and his excellent posts. However, I cannot agree 100% with his post about " WF - Unit Testing: How to create Activity Type from XOML? ". When not reading it carefully, it can be misunderstood in a way that the actual "Activity Type" is created from XOML...